Connect with us

US & Canada

Brunei transgender teen seeks asylum in Canada after passing of Islamic legal guidelines to punish gays, adultery and rape with loss of life – NEWPAPER24



Brunei transgender teen seeks asylum in Canada after passing of Islamic legal guidelines to punish gays, adultery and rape with loss of life

2019-04-17 06:38:59

Zoella Zayce shows no images of her household in her basement flat in Vancouver, 1000’s of miles from the place she left them in Brunei. The 19-year-old refugee claimant is a transgender lady, one thing she by no means instructed the household she describes as conservative.Again house, household and associates generally requested if she was homosexual. It was an alarming query within the Southeast Asian nation, which this month launched new Islamic legal guidelines to punish homosexuality, adultery and rape with the loss of life penalty,…

US & Canada

Accuracy at core of Supreme Courtroom case over census query – NEWPAPER24




Accuracy at core of Supreme Courtroom case over census query

2019-04-21 11:30:42

WASHINGTON (AP) – Justice Elena Kagan’s father was three years previous when the census taker got here to the household’s house on Ocean Parkway in Brooklyn, New York, on April 10, 1930.

Robert Kagan was initially wrongly listed as an “alien,” although he was a native-born New Yorker. The entry about his citizenship standing seems to have been crossed out on the census kind.

Huge modifications in America and expertise have dramatically altered the best way the census is carried out. However the accuracy of the once-a-decade inhabitants rely is on the coronary heart of the Supreme Courtroom case over the Trump administration’s effort so as to add a citizenship query to the 2020 census.

The justices are listening to arguments within the case on Tuesday, with a choice due by late June that can enable for printing types in time for the rely in April 2020.

The struggle over the census query is the most recent over immigration-related points between Democratic-led states and advocates for immigrants, on one aspect, and the administration, on the opposite. The Supreme Courtroom final yr upheld President Donald Trump’s ban on guests to the U.S. from a number of principally Muslim international locations. The courtroom additionally has briefly blocked administration plans to make it more durable for folks to assert asylum and is contemplating an administration attraction that may enable Trump to finish protections for immigrants who have been delivered to this nation as kids.

The citizenship query has not been requested on the census kind despatched to each American family since 1950, and the administration’s want so as to add it’s now rife with political implications and partisan division.

Federal judges in California , Maryland and New York have blocked the administration from going ahead with a citizenship query after crediting the evaluation of Census Bureau consultants who discovered {that a} query would injury the general accuracy of the census and trigger tens of millions of Hispanics and immigrants to go uncounted. That in flip would value a number of states seats within the U.S. Home and billions of {dollars} in federal {dollars} which might be decided by census outcomes.

The three judges have rejected the administration’s arguments that asking about citizenship gained’t hurt accuracy and that the knowledge is required to assist implement provisions of the federal Voting Rights Act.

The Census Bureau’s constant view because the 1960 census has been that asking everybody about citizenship “would produce a much less correct inhabitants rely,” 5 former company administrators who served in Democratic and Republic administrations wrote in a Supreme Courtroom transient .

No inhabitants rely is ideal, and census designers try to create a questionnaire that’s clear and simple to reply.

In older censuses, a authorities employee generally known as an enumerator would go to households and report data. In fashionable instances, folks fill in their very own types on paper or electronically.

However the potential for errant solutions is ever-present, mentioned Debbie Soren, the treasurer of the Illinois chapter of the Jewish Genealogical Society.

“Typically folks didn’t at all times need to be forthcoming, together with of their ages, for no matter motive. Typically there is perhaps a language barrier. Or the individual reporting the knowledge may not be the very best one to report it,” Soren mentioned.

It appears probably that the census taker himself was liable for the confusion in Robert Kagan’s citizenship standing. Dozens of households who lived close to the Kagans have comparable crossed-out entries within the citizenship column.

Whereas Kagan’s father was born in america, her grandfather, Irving Kagan, was a Russian immigrant who had submitted his paperwork to change into an American citizen, the 1930 census reveals. By 1940, Irving Kagan was a citizen. The previous census types, by 1940, may be searched on The 1950 census will change into public in 2022.

If previous census studies go away a large berth for error, they nonetheless maintain a wealth of knowledge, mentioned Sharon DeBartolo Carmack of Salt Lake Metropolis, the writer of “You Can Write Your Household Historical past.”

Earlier than 1960, the census typically requested the place folks have been born and, if overseas, whether or not they have been U.S. residents. “It’s fantastic to us as researchers, despite the fact that we don’t just like the politics, don’t just like the motivation,” Carmack mentioned.

Kagan is amongst seven of the 9 justices whose ancestors instructed census takers they have been immigrants who had change into Americans. They got here from England, Germany, Eire, Italy and Russia, like so many others looking for a greater life.

The fathers of Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Samuel Alito have been immigrants from Russia and Italy, respectively.

Within the 1910 census, Patrick Kavanaugh, the great-grandfather of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, was dwelling in New Haven, Connecticut, an iron employee who had change into a citizen after leaving Eire within the 1870s.

By 1900, the English-born great-grandmother of Chief Justice John Roberts and the German-born great-grandfather of Justice Stephen Breyer additionally have been U.S. residents.

Two of Justice Neil Gorsuch’s great-great grandfathers, Alex Tiehen and Hugh O’Grady, lived in Nebraska, in accordance with the 1900 census. Tiehen got here from Germany in 1845 and O’Grady emigrated from Eire two years later. By the flip of the final century, each reported they have been U.S. residents.

There are two justices with very completely different paths to American citizenship. Justice Clarence Thomas is the descendant of slaves and Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s Puerto Rican ancestors grew to become Americans beneath a 1917 federal legislation. Spain ceded the territory to america after the Spanish-American Struggle.

The case is Division of Commerce v. New York, 18-966 .

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Instances, LLC.

The Washington Instances Remark Coverage

The Washington Instances welcomes your feedback on, our third-party supplier. Please learn our Remark Coverage earlier than commenting.

Continue Reading

US & Canada

Chuck Todd: Now It Appears Like Trump Is Colluding With Invoice Barr | Video – NEWPAPER24




Chuck Todd: Now It Appears Like Trump Is Colluding With Invoice Barr | Video

2019-04-18 13:04:41

Newpaper24’s Chuck Todd responded Wednesday to reviews that the DOJ has briefed White Home attorneys about particulars of the Mueller report:

CHUCK TODD: I don’t know what you wish to name it. Shamelessness, hubris, no matter it’s. However the truth that had any Democrat tried something like this, the impeachment hearings could be––I imply, when Barack Obama on 60 Minutes stated, ‘You understand, these emails… it doesn’t appear to be there’s a lot there there.’ ‘Oh, my God. He can’t discuss a prison investigation.’

The place are all of those Home Republicans now that had been so up in arms in regards to the president speaking about Hillary Clinton’s emails, when what you’ve got right here, the lawyer basic briefing the President of the USA on a case that entails the President of the USA. What’s the distinction?…

That is precise collusion!

In case you’re questioning what does collusion appear to be, it appears just like the lawyer basic’s attorneys briefing the president earlier than Congress or the general public.

Continue Reading

US & Canada

AP FACT CHECK: Trump staff’s distortions on Mueller report – NEWPAPER24




AP FACT CHECK: Trump staff’s distortions on Mueller report

2019-04-20 12:30:01

WASHINGTON (AP) – Particular counsel Robert Mueller all however boldfaced this discovering in his report on the Russia investigation: No exoneration for President Donald Trump on whether or not Trump criminally obstructed justice.

However Trump and his aides are stating that Mueller’s report did exonerate. No phrases from the report will throw them off their mischaracterization of it.

A have a look at claims by Trump and his folks on a wide range of topics from the week that produced the Mueller report, which cleared Trump of felony conspiracy with Russia, traced a number of methods he tried to intrude within the Russia inquiry to his profit and got here to no conclusion on whether or not these acts broke the regulation.


TRUMP: “The top results of the best Witch Hunt in U.S. political historical past is No Collusion with Russia (and No Obstruction). Fairly Superb! – tweet Saturday.

VICE PRESIDENT MIKE PENCE: “Immediately’s launch of the Particular Counsel’s report confirms what the President and I’ve stated since day one: there was no collusion between the Trump marketing campaign and Russia and there was no obstruction of justice.” – assertion Thursday.

KELLYANNE CONWAY, White Home counselor: “What issues is what the Division of Justice and particular counsel concluded right here, which isn’t any collusion, no obstruction, and full exoneration, because the president says.” – remarks Thursday to reporters.

THE FACTS: The particular counsel’s 400-plus-page report particularly doesn’t exonerate Trump, leaving open the query of whether or not the president obstructed justice.

“If we had confidence after a radical investigation of the info that the President clearly didn’t commit obstruction of justice, we might so state,” Mueller wrote. “Based mostly on the info and the relevant authorized requirements, nonetheless, we’re unable to succeed in that judgment.”

The report identifies 10 cases of attainable obstruction by Trump and stated he might need “had a motive” to impede the investigation due to what it might discover on a wide range of private issues, reminiscent of his proposal to construct a Trump Tower in Moscow.

“The proof does point out {that a} thorough FBI investigation would uncover info concerning the marketing campaign and the President personally that the President might have understood to be crimes or that will give rise to private and political considerations,” the report states.

In explaining its choice, Mueller’s staff stated reaching a conclusion on whether or not Trump dedicated crimes can be inappropriate due to a Justice Division authorized opinion indicating {that a} sitting president shouldn’t be prosecuted. It however left open at the very least the theoretical risk that Trump could possibly be charged after he leaves workplace, noting that its factual investigation was carried out “in an effort to protect the proof when reminiscences had been contemporary and documentary materials had been accessible.”

“Accordingly, whereas this report doesn’t conclude that the President dedicated against the law, it additionally doesn’t exonerate him,” the report states.


SARAH SANDERS, White Home press secretary, on her statements from 2017 that many individuals within the FBI needed James Comey, the director, fired: “The sentiment is 100% correct.” – “Newpaper24 This Morning,” Friday.

THE FACTS: Her reply on this topic was far totally different when she gave it underneath oath.

After Trump fired Comey, she advised reporters on Might 10, 2017, that “the rank and file of the FBI had misplaced confidence of their director” and “accordingly” the president eliminated him. When a reporter stated most FBI brokers supported Comey, Sanders stated, “Look, we’ve heard from numerous members of the FBI that say very various things.”

However when Mueller’s staff interviewed her underneath oath, she backed off that story. In response to the Mueller report, she stated it was a “slip of the tongue” to say that numerous FBI folks needed Comey out, that her assertion concerning the rank and file shedding confidence in him was supplied “within the warmth of the second” and that, within the report’s phrases, it “was not based on something.”

Now she’s again to suggesting that Comey was in truth unpopular within the FBI. “I stated that it was within the warmth of the second, which means it wasn’t a scripted factor,” she stated Friday. “However the large takeaway right here is that the sentiment is 100% correct.”

The Mueller report says there’s “no proof” that Trump heard complaints about Comey’s management from FBI staff earlier than firing him.

Mueller evaluated almost a dozen episodes for attainable obstruction of justice and stated he couldn’t conclusively decide that Trump had dedicated felony obstruction. Amongst these episodes was his method of firing Comey. Mueller discovered “substantial proof” corroborating Comey’s account of a dinner at which he stated Trump pressed him for his loyalty.

Though Sanders attributed her comment about Comey’s unpopularity to “warmth of the second,” Trump has voiced the identical sentiment. As lately as January, he tweeted: “The rank and file of the FBI are nice people who find themselves disgusted with what they’re studying about Lyin’ James Comey and the so-called ‘leaders’ of the FBI.”


ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, requested if Mueller supposed for Congress, not the lawyer basic, to resolve whether or not Trump obstructed justice: “Effectively, particular counsel Mueller didn’t point out that his function was to depart the choice to Congress. I hope that was not his view. … I didn’t discuss to him instantly about the truth that we had been making the choice, however I’m advised that his response to that was that it was my prerogative as lawyer basic to make that call.”

THE FACTS: Mueller’s report really does point out that Congress might make that dedication.

The report states that no individual is above the regulation, together with the president, and that the Structure “doesn’t categorically and completely immunize a President for obstructing justice.”

In his four-page memo final month, Barr stated whereas Mueller left open the query of whether or not Trump broke the regulation and obstructed the investigation, Barr was in the end deciding as lawyer basic that the proof developed by Mueller was “not ample” to determine, for the needs of prosecution, that Trump obstructed justice.

However the particular counsel’s report specifies that Congress may also render a judgment on that query.

It says: “The conclusion that Congress might apply obstruction legal guidelines to the President’s corrupt train of the powers of workplace accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the precept that no individual is above the regulation.”


BARR: “These experiences should not presupposed to be made public.” – remarks Thursday on the Justice Division.

THE FACTS: The lawyer basic isn’t going out on a limb for public disclosure.

Justice Division rules give Barr large authority to launch a particular counsel’s report in conditions it “can be within the public curiosity.” Barr had made clear throughout his Senate affirmation listening to in January that he believed in transparency with the report on Mueller’s investigation into Russian election interference in the course of the 2016 marketing campaign, “per rules and the regulation.”


BARR, saying it was “per long-standing apply” for him to Share a replica of the redacted report with the White Home and president’s attorneys earlier than its launch: “Earlier this week, the president’s private counsel requested and got the chance to learn a closing model of the redacted report earlier than it was publicly launched. That request was per the apply adopted underneath the Ethics in Authorities Act, which permitted people named in a report ready by an impartial counsel the chance to learn the report earlier than publication.” – remarks Thursday.

THE FACTS: Barr’s choice, citing the Ethics in Authorities Act, is inconsistent with impartial counsel Ken Starr’s dealing with of his report into whether or not President Invoice Clinton obstructed and lied in Starr’s probe.

On Sept. 7, 1998, Clinton’s lawyer David Kendall requested that Starr present him a chance to overview the report earlier than it was despatched to Congress. Starr rapidly turned him down.

“As a matter of authorized interpretation, I respectfully disagree along with your evaluation,” Starr wrote to Kendall two days later. Starr referred to as Kendall “mistaken” concerning the rights of the president’s attorneys to “overview a ‘report’ earlier than it’s transmitted to Congress.”

Starr’s report was ruled by the ethics act cited by Barr as his justification for exhibiting the report back to the president’s staff. It has since expired. Present rules governing Mueller’s work don’t specify how confidential info needs to be shared with the White Home.

Starr’s report led to the impeachment trial of Clinton in 1999.



TRUMP: “We reduce your taxes. Greatest tax reduce in historical past.”- remarks Monday in Burnsville, Minnesota.

THE FACTS: His tax cuts are nowhere near the largest in U.S. historical past.

It’s a $1.5 trillion tax reduce over 10 years. As a Share of the overall economic system, a tax reduce of that measurement ranks 12th, in line with the Committee for a Accountable Federal Funds. President Ronald Reagan’s 1981 reduce is the largest adopted by the 1945 rollback of taxes that financed World Warfare II.

Put up-Reagan tax cuts additionally stand among the many traditionally important: President George W. Bush’s cuts within the early 2000s and President Barack Obama’s renewal of them a decade later.


TRUMP: “I consider will probably be Loopy Bernie Sanders vs. Sleepy Joe Biden as the 2 finalists to run towards possibly the very best Financial system within the historical past of our Nation.” – tweet Tuesday.

TRUMP: “We might have the very best economic system we’ve ever had.” – remarks in Minnesota.

THE FACTS: The economic system is wholesome however not probably the greatest in historical past. Additionally, there are indicators it’s weakening after a spurt of progress final 12 months.

The economic system expanded at an annual charge of two.9 p.c final 12 months, a strong tempo. Nevertheless it was simply the quickest in 4 years. Within the late 1990s, progress topped four p.c for 4 straight years, a stage it has not but reached underneath Trump. And progress even reached 7.2 p.c in 1984.

Impartial economists broadly anticipate slower progress this 12 months as the results of the Trump administration’s tax cuts fade, commerce tensions and slower international progress maintain again exports, and better rates of interest make it costlier to borrow to purchase vehicles and houses.


Related Press writers Josh Boak and Darlene Superville contributed to this report.


Discover AP Truth Checks at

Observe @APFactCheck on Twitter:

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Instances, LLC.

The Washington Instances Remark Coverage

The Washington Instances welcomes your feedback on, our third-party supplier. Please learn our Remark Coverage earlier than commenting.

Continue Reading


Select Category

Most popular

Select Language »