Connect with us

US & Canada

Gaetz: Comey Would not Reply A Lot Of Questions About The FISA Course of, Contradicted Lawyer | Video – NEWPAPER24

Published

on

Gaetz: Comey Would not Reply A Lot Of Questions About The FISA Course of, Contradicted Lawyer | Video

2018-12-08 02:37:41


Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) responded to James Comey calling it “nonsense” that the FISA course of was abused.

“One other case of selective amnesia,” Gaetz informed FNC’s Martha MacCallum of the previous FBI director’s testimony Friday.

GAETZ: He would not reply quite a lot of questions concerning the FISA course of, however I believe it’s notable within the data offered to the FISA court docket there was not an correct description of who paid for what. That is one other space the place Comey’s testimony contradicted his personal lawyer. Jim Baker had talked about how uncomfortable and bizarre it was that he had come into possession of the file and was a part of the chain of custody for that file. That is not one thing that basic counsels of the FBI usually do.

As we speak, Comey informed us that he by no means knew that Perkins Coie lawfirm was taking cash from the DNC after which utilizing that cash to pay Christopher Steele to say issues and to develop a narrative concerning the president. And in order that’s fairly inconceivable to me that the final counsel of the FBI is uncomfortable coming into the chain of custody of proof that had by no means occur earlier than and by some means the director of the FBI is aware of nothing about it.

US & Canada

Chuck Schumer Responds To Trump’s “Mood Tantrum” In The Oval Workplace: Holding Authorities “Hostage” For “Petty” Wall | Video – NEWPAPER24

Published

on

By

Chuck Schumer Responds To Trump’s “Mood Tantrum” In The Oval Workplace: Holding Authorities “Hostage” For “Petty” Wall | Video

2018-12-12 19:16:02


Senate Minority Chief Chuck Schumer talks about funds negotiations with the president by which Trump is threatening to close down the federal government if the border wall shouldn’t be funded. Schumer and Home Minority Chief Nancy Pelosi publicly debated the president’s name to fund a border wall within the Oval Workplace on Tuesday.

“The president has referred to as for a shutdown a minimum of 20 occasions since he got here into workplace,” Schumer stated. “You’ll be able to add a minimum of 5 – 6 extra occasions from our assembly!”

“No president ought to ever say he can be proud to close the federal government down,” Schumer stated. “No president ought to so glibly use the American authorities, and the tens of millions of staff who work so laborious, as a bargaining chip. That’s the place President Trump is headed.”

“He has made clear he’ll maintain elements of the federal government hostage for a petty marketing campaign pledge — that is all it’s,” Schumer stated in regards to the president’s calls to construct a wall on the Mexican border. “If President Trump holds to this place, that until he will get his wall he’ll shut down the federal government, who will undergo needlessly? The American folks.”

Continue Reading

US & Canada

The ‘Worldwide Group’ Is not a Group – NEWPAPER24

Published

on

By

The ‘Worldwide Group’ Is not a Group

2018-12-12 13:22:27



Fairly often lately, we hear in regards to the great richness of the worldwide group. People are chastised for failing to associate with the worldwide group on local weather change; failing to observe the consensus of the worldwide group on well being care; failing to reflect the priorities of the worldwide group in overseas coverage.

However this is the truth: There is no such thing as a worldwide group. There may be merely a gaggle of states motivated by self-interest. Generally these self-interests overlap. Different occasions they do not. However let’s not faux that the worldwide group by some means maintains a form of collective ethical standing merely by dint of numbers. In truth, exactly the alternative is commonly true.

Take, for instance, the United Nations’ latest choice to not condemn the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas.

This week, the U.N. Basic Meeting voted on a decision condemning the group for “repeatedly firing rockets into Israel and for inciting violence, thereby placing civilians in danger,” in addition to for utilizing property to assemble “tunnels to infiltrate Israel and tools to launch rockets into civilian areas.” The U.N., which requires a two-thirds vote to go a Basic Meeting decision, voted down the decision — 87 nations in favor, 58 towards, 32 abstaining. All in all, that implies that extra nations voted towards ratifying the decision — 90 — than in favor of it.

Up so far, the U.N. has by no means handed a single decision towards Hamas.

Simply days later, Palestinian terrorists opened hearth on a gaggle of individuals ready for a bus close to Ofra, a settlement in Judea and Samaria. The drive-by taking pictures wounded seven individuals, together with a pregnant lady and her unborn little one, in addition to her husband. Each the lady and the infant at the moment are in crucial situation; it is going to be a miracle if each survive. In accordance with The Occasions of Israel, Hamas instantly praised the assault, deeming it “heroic” and an “affirmation of our individuals‘s selection and legitimacy in resisting the Zionist occupation and its settlers.”

Hamas is not hiding the ball. It’s evil. It celebrates evil. It pays terrorists to commit acts of evil. However the worldwide group is not hiding the ball both when its members refuse to sentence terrorism as terrorism when it’s directed towards disfavored members of the worldwide group.

Take, in contrast, the worldwide group’s response to a terrorist assault directed towards an Iranian navy parade in late September. The U.N. Safety Council forcibly condemned the assault, calling it a “heinous and cowardly terrorist assault” and pledging its assist to “maintain perpetrators, organizers, financiers and sponsors of those reprehensible acts of terrorism accountable and convey them to justice.”

What is the distinction? Solely the perpetrators and the targets. The worldwide group is a joke. Maybe america ought to vary its local weather change or well being care or gun insurance policies. However these arguments ought to by no means be made on the premise of the worldwide customary of morality — a typical that does not exist, has by no means existed and ought not be the topic of pretending by Western nations that should know higher.

COPYRIGHT 2018 CREATORS.COM

Continue Reading

US & Canada

Is Canada Goose cooked? Shares slide as Chinese language consumers demand boycott over arrest of Huawei CFO Sabrina Meng Wanzhou – NEWPAPER24

Published

on

By

Is Canada Goose cooked? Shares slide as Chinese language consumers demand boycott over arrest of Huawei CFO Sabrina Meng Wanzhou

2018-12-12 20:59:58


Rising tensions between Beijing and Ottawa over the arrest of Huawei CFO Sabrina Meng Wanzhou have inflicted harm on the luxurious clothes retailer Canada Goose, as Chinese language customers name for a boycott of the model.

Shares within the firm have plunged almost 20 per cent because the arrest on Meng in Vancouver on December 1. A Canadian choose granted bail to Meng on Tuesday.

The corporate’s slide within the inventory market comes amid studies {that a} former Canadian diplomat, Michael Kovrig, has been detained in China. He’s going through accusations of harming state safety, based on Chinese language media.

Analysts had warned that Canadian companies might face elevated stress if China takes punitive measures over Meng’s arrest, which was made on the request of the US, which seeks her extradition on fraud costs associated to alleged breaches of sanctions towards Iran.

Canada caught in crossfire as Trump mixes enterprise with politics

In recent times, numerous flagship Canadian corporations – together with the practice producer Bombardier and doughnut retailer Tim Hortons – have sought to make inroads in China, a coveted and largely untapped marketplace for Canadian corporations.

Canada Goose, well-known for its down parkas, seems to be the primary casualty of the diplomatic row over Meng: requires a boycott unfold rapidly on the social media platform Weibo and have been echoed by state-run media.

“You have a look at Canada Goose and it says Canada proper in it,” stated Bruce Winder, co-founder of the Retail Advisors Community. “It’s very simple for individuals to form of choose up on that.”

The attire firm is ready to open its first bodily location in Beijing within the coming days. Dani Reiss, the corporate’s president and CEO, was within the Chinese language capital final month, and the day earlier than Meng’s arrest he instructed the Globe and Mail: “We undoubtedly have loads of model recognition right here, which is nice.”

Ex-Canadian ambassador warns Kovrig detention has precedent as reprisal

China makes up 10 per cent of the corporate’s world gross sales – however the firm has hoped to extend within the coming years, with Reiss calling the enlargement potential “completely large”.

As of Monday, Bosideng – a rival Chinese language attire firm – has seen its inventory attain five-year highs.

Canada Goose didn’t reply to a request for remark.

“I hope it blows over the subsequent couple days,” stated Winder. “However it all is determined by sentiment. It might worsen and also you would possibly see different corporations change into boycotted as effectively.”



Continue Reading

ONLY FOR YOU

Select Category

Most popular

Select Language »